Gerald L. Curtis :: Although the Diet has
not lived up to its constitutional role as the supreme organ of state
power, it is the arena from within which the political leadership of
Japan is chosen. And in that sense, there is no longer the fragmentation
of power that existed before the Second World War when the emperor was
in theory all-powerful — so that the bureaucracy had power, the
military had power, the Diet had some power, but there was no clear accountability
or center for political power in Japan. Under the post-war system, since
power resides with the Diet, the party that controls the majority in
the Diet exercises political power and forms the government
Japan is a typical parliamentary system in which the executive, that
is the prime minister, is chosen from among the members of the parliament,
so that the political party that has a majority of seats, or the coalition
of parties that control a majority of seats, decides who the prime minister
is going to be, and that prime minister then appoints his cabinet, also
from among the members of the Diet.
[Comparison with the U.S. Political
System]
Japan does not have a separation of powers like we have in the United
States, where the executive, the head of the executive branch, the president,
is elected directly by the people, the Congress is elected separately,
and there is a separation between the two in terms of their powers. |