Robert Oxnam :: After
a long period of warfare and chaos, the Tokugawa placed primacy on political
order, social order, and order in international relations. Tokugawa political
order was exercised through a system of "centralized feudalism."
Carol Gluck :: Which means that you have feudal
lords with their own domains, and yet, there is a centralized state that
is, that has the shogun at the head. The shogun is the de facto ruler of
the country, who rules at the order of the emperor, but in fact, rules the
country. It is a hereditary, military rule, so that Tokugawa shoguns ruled
the country from 1600, or 1603, to 1868.
Robert Oxnam :: Tokugawa Ieyasu was able to gain
control of the entire country. Once a daimyo himself, now he became shogun, ruling
over the roughly 250 other daimyo across Japan. Thus the Tokugawa house centralized
a system that was still feudal in shape. A very important part of Tokugawa centralized
feudalism was known as the "alternate attendance system" or sankin kôtai.
Henry D. Smith, II :: It simply meant that every daimyo
from every one of these two-hundred-sixty odd domains had to live every other year
in the capital city of Edo and to leave permanently his main wife and his heir,
that is the future daimyo, living permanently in the city. This had immense implications
for the long course of Tokugawa history.
It meant, for example, that every daimyo after, say, the year 1700, was born and
bred in Edo and felt himself to be a native of the city. It also meant that huge
numbers of local samurai in Japan commuted, in effect, some of them every other
year, from their domains to the capital city.
Also huge transfers of wealth were involved in all of this. The daimyo had to
broker their rice — typically those from the prosperous areas of west Japan,
in the city of Osaka — in order to gain cash to pay for the expenses of the
trip. In this way wealth circulated throughout the country. It is not too different
from the case of Europe where, for example, in France under the Bourbon regime
we find various of the provincial lords regularly assembling at Versailles, the
palace of the king.
So this kind of circulation of elites is characteristic of many early modem societies.
Japan simply carried it to an extreme and, particularly, in its formalized provisions.
But it was extremely important in holding together a society which may seem as
somewhat prone to dispersal otherwise. |